Black Crawling Systems Archive Release 1.0/Black Crawling Systems Archive Release 1.0 (L0pht Heavy Industries, Inc.)(1997).ISO/tezcat/Beter/Beter27

Internet Message Format | 1996-07-07 | 41KB

From the Radio Free Michigan archives

ftp://141.209.3.26/pub/patriot

If you have any other files you'd like to contribute, e-mail them to
[e-mail].
------------------------------------------------

   This is the Dr. Beter Audioletter, Box 16428, Ft. Worth, Texas
76133

   Hello my friends, this is Dr. Beter. Today is Oct. 29, 1977, and
this is my Audioletter No. 27. Fifteen years ago yesterday, on Oct.
28, 1962, America breathed a sigh of relief as the Cuban Missile
Crisis ended in surrender by the Soviet Union. On that Sunday morning,
Radio Moscow announced that all work on the offensive missile sites in
Cuba was being stopped and that they would be dismantled under United
Nations observation--so ended 6 days in which the world teetered
visibly on the brink of nuclear war, thanks to a dangerous Soviet
gamble.

   The public crisis had begun with a televised speech by President
John F. Kennedy on Monday evening, Oct. 22, 1962. Tens of millions of
Americans huddled before our TV sets, having been told in news reports
all day long that something big was afoot. When President Kennedy told
us the Soviet offensive nuclear missiles were almost operational in
Cuba, some Americans were taken by surprise, others were not. Those
who were not surprised had heard the warnings of the late Senator
Kenneth Keating of New York. For more than a year he had been warning
about the Cuban missiles in speeches nationwide. But many other
Americans were shocked to hear about the missiles from President
Kennedy that evening. Some had never heard Senator Keating's earlier
warnings, thanks to a major media blackout on the story. Others had
heard but they had believed the denials issued by the Government. But
what was stunning to everyone, the Kremlin included, was the response
by President Kennedy to the Cuban missile threat. Avoiding use of the
word "blockade" which in international law is an act of war, President
Kennedy announced a so-called quarantine on offensive shipments to
Cuba. It would be enforced by what was then the most powerful navy on
earth, the United States Navy. Furthermore, the President demanded
that the missile sites be dismantled and Soviet forces withdrawn,
otherwise stronger action by America was threatened. Then came the
bone-chilling words: "Any missile launched from Cuba against any
nation shall be regarded as an attack by the Soviet Union on the
United States, requiring full retaliation." Refusing to pretend that
Cuba was the culprit, Jack Kennedy confronted the Soviet Union head on
and in terms of the one thing that commands Soviet respect--military
power.

   The great historian Carroll Quigley, who passed away early this
year, summarized the circumstances in the Cuba crisis very accurately
in his monumental work, "TRAGEDY AND HOPE" published by MacMillan in
1966:

   "The dominant fact in the whole situation was the overwhelming
character of America's power, and the fact that this was known both to
the White House and to the Kremlin but was largely unknown and
certainly unpublicized to the world. Around the Soviet Union's border
were 144 Polaris, 103 Atlas, 159 Thor, Jupiter, and Titan missiles,
1600 long-range bombers many of them constantly in the air with
nuclear bombs. When the President's speech began the public crisis, 5
divisions of the U.S. Army strategic reserve totaling about 100,000
men, plus 100,000 Air Force and an equal number of Naval and Marine
personnel had been mobilized or alerted. The First Armored Division
had been flown from Texas to the east coast, 90 naval vessels
including 8 carriers were on patrol to blockade. A Cuban invasion
command had been assembled in Florida and 2700 relatives of military
personnel had been evacuated from Guantanamo. Under such pressure
Khrushchev wilted--it might almost be said that he panicked--on
Friday, October 26."

And two days later Radio Moscow made the announcement giving in to
Kennedy's demands. Many critics have pointed out that after the crisis
itself, America seemingly left needless loopholes for Soviet cheating
in the Cuban withdrawal process. But regardless of that, it was the
overwhelming power of America that prevented nuclear war in the Cuban
crisis itself.

   Two years before the Cuban crisis, Gen. Nathan Twining retiring as
the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, warned America: "Forces
that cannot win will not deter." These few words of common sense
distilled the lessons of several thousand years of military history;
and in October 1962 the Cuban missile crisis proved that they are as
true in a nuclear age as they ever were before. One would think that
such a close brush with nuclear disaster would have alerted the
American people to the realities of survival in an enduring way--but
it did not. The four to one military advantage over Russia enjoyed by
America in 1962 was not brought home to the American public as the
critical factor that had prevented a war. It was only later in context
with words like "over-kill", "measured response", and "mutual assured
destruction" that our previous military preponderance was brought to
public attention; and the purpose then was to whittle it down to
nothing.

   But if the American people failed to learn the lesson of Cuba, the
Kremlin did not. The lesson was learned best of all by Leonid
Brezhnev, Khrushchev's rocket boss. Khrushchev's failure in the Cuban
missile affair was the beginning of the end for him in the Kremlin,
yet ironically when Khrushchev was deposed in 1964, it was none other
than Brezhnev who had actually masterminded the Cuban missile plan who
took Khrushchev's place--and Brezhnev was determined that the Soviet
Union would not again suffer such a debacle.

   Today the similarities to the Cuban missile crisis are striking.
Now, as then, we are again targeted with short-range nuclear missiles,
except this time they are lurking within our own territorial waters,
ready for underwater launch upon satellite command. Now, as then, the
Soviet missile crisis has been underway for more than a year, and the
American people are kept ignorant of the facts by the major media
blackout of the story and by government denials. And now, as then, the
dominant fact is the lopsided military advantage possessed by one
side-- but this time it isn't just missiles that threaten us, it also
includes underwater nuclear mines strewn throughout our own country by
Soviet agents. And again, the public is being deceived jointly by the
Federal government and the controlled major media--not merely by
silence and denial but by propaganda that helps to cover up
hostilities that are already being directed against us by our enemy.
Worst of all, the lopsided military imbalance now favors not America
but the Soviet Union.

   During the past month unusually rapid, puzzling, and dramatic
changes have begun sweeping across the international arena. In the
Middle East, three years of Soviet eclipse have suddenly been ended by
joint Soviet/American declarat ion; and, in the process, a drastic
change in American policy toward Israel has surfaced. Red China, after
a decade of bitter struggling with the Soviet Union, suddenly began
making concrete moves toward reconciliation with Russia early this
month. India's Prime Minister Desai, who used to denounce Communism,
traveled to Moscow early this month and now says India's friendship
with the Soviet Union is "cemented." News and commentaries suddenly
assure us that a thaw is taking place between the Soviet Union and the
United States, and on all sides disarmament has all of a sudden become
the overriding topic in world affairs.

   These developments and many more have all come about since
America's disastrous defeat by the Soviet Union last month, on Sept.
27, 1977, in the still-secret Battle of the Harvest Moon. This was
history's first full-fledged space battle; and as I told you in detail
last month in Audioletter No. 26, the Soviet Union emerged as the only
possessor of the decisive new Particle Beam weapon. It is this Soviet
military breakthrough that is at the root of what now looks like an
avalanche of diplomatic breakthroughs involving the Soviet Union all
over the world.

   As it stands now, my friends, the cold, hard truth is this: The
Soviet Union could attack the United States now and win; but American
retaliation could, nevertheless, inflict considerable suffering on
Russia as the price of such a Soviet conquest--and they prefer to
destroy us without suffering themselves, and that is the direction in
which events are now moving.

   My three topics for today are: Topic #1--THE SOVIET PARTICLE BEAM
AND KILLER SATELLITES; Topic #2--THE SPREADING ATOMIC PLAGUE CALLED
LEGIONNAIRE'S DISEASE; and Topic #3--THE ENFORCED DISARMING OF AMERICA
NOW UNDERWAY.

Topic #1--Last month in Audioletter No. 26 recorded Sept. 30, 1977, I
revealed the fact that the Soviet Union has become the first nation on
earth to possess a new super-weapon, the Particle Beam, which is now
deployed in earth orbit. The first Particle Beam Killer Satellite was
launched three months ago on July 17, 1977, and is known as Cosmos
929.

   As I told you last month, the first operational test against the
target was carried out over the Soviet Union during the early hours of
Sept. 20, 1977. An American spy satellite was blasted into a huge
fireball that was seen hundreds of miles away. Exactly two weeks
later, on October 4, 1977, Secretary of Defense Harold Brown held a
news conference in which he shocked everyone with the unexpected
words: "There is a fact of Soviet anti-satellite, not only development
but operational capability." And he added: "That's something of
concern to me because we rely a good deal on our space systems for
support of our military capability, which capability, I think,
contributes to deterring, preventing war." After Dr. Brown spoke,
other Defense officials singled out our low-flying spy satellites as
being vulnerable to the Soviet killer satellites, which are also known
as Cosmos Interceptors. However, neither Dr. Brown nor the other
spokesmen would explain for the record and for the American people how
the new Cosmos Interceptors work. After all, the Russians know!
Reporters were therefore left with nothing to suggest in their
articles except the 10-year-old Soviet anti-satellite concept of an
explosive interceptor, which would maneuver close to the target and
then blow up. The fact that Particle Beam weapons are involved was not
mentioned.

   In January of this year the outgoing Pentagon Research Director,
Dr. Malcolm Currie, gave Congress a warning. He said that it would be
catastrophic to let the Soviets gain an advantage over us in the area
of anti-satellite weapons. And no wonder. Satellites today play a
central role in the military communications, intelligence gathering,
and early warning of any possible attack. Unusual troop movements or
other preparations for attack can be detected, and even the firing of
ICBMs would be detected only by satellites. Without our spy
satellites, we would be blinded to any surprise attack by strategic
missiles; and yet the SALT II Accord, which Jimmy Carter is now
working so feverishly to promote, includes no provision at all against
anti-satellite weapons.

   As I reported in Audioletter No. 26 at the end of last month, four
days before Dr. Brown's stunning announcement about operational Soviet
Killer Satellites, there were two Cosmos 929 class Interceptors in
orbit. Now there are 8! And now the Soviet Union is picking off
American strategic satellites one by one, creating a tremendous
fireball each time like the one I described to you last month.

   On October 13, earlier this month, CBS Radio News reported that a
number of people have expressed concern about seeing several fireballs
over Russia. They inquired what they could be, thinking they might be
UFOs from outer space. But a Russian scientist who was interviewed
about it said the fireballs were nothing to worry about, that they
were merely Cosmos phenomena. And of course he was telling the truth
in a tongue-in-cheek way, since the recent astonishing fireball
phenomena are caused by Cosmos Particle Beam Interceptors. But the
granddaddy of all the fireballs so far was the one which erupted over
the United States on the evening of October 18, just eleven days ago.
Hundreds of witnesses reported seeing the huge fireball all the way
from the McDonald Observatory in extreme southwest Texas to points
over several hundred miles away in Arkansas and Missouri, as well as
in the neighboring states of Oklahoma and Louisiana. It was so bright
that people hundreds of miles apart thought it had hit near them, and
so huge that astronomers said it should have reached the ground; but
according to radar and military observers, it exploded in mid air with
a bright flash. Whether any pieces survived and hit the ground is not
known at this time. Thus the 85-ton American space station known as
SKYLAB, launched four years ago, came to a spectacular end at the
hands of a Soviet Cosmos Interceptor. The Soviet Union wanted to
insure that Skylab could not be pressed into service by America in any
way to begin to undo the fast-growing Soviet domination of space. And
just in case any chunks of the big space station should reach the
ground without burning up, thereby possibly doing damage or injury,
Skylab was destroyed over the United States instead of over the Soviet
Union. Nine days later, the Government released an elaborate cover
story about Skylab by way of the CBS Evening News for October 27,
1977. While we were shown official NASA film of Skylab in orbit, we
were told that for some strange reason Skylab's orbit is decaying
sooner than expected and that it might well come down prematurely.
Now, my friends, if someone should find pieces of it lying around, the
groundwork has already been laid for a future public explanation.

   The Soviet use of their new Particle Beam weapon to blow our
strategic satellites out of the sky is bad enough, but this is only
the beginning. As I explained in detail last month, America's secret
Moon Base in Copernicus Crater was put out of action on Sept. 27,
1977. It was bombarded with a Soviet Neutron Particle Beam which
killed all of our astronauts there. The Copernicus base was itself
equipped with Particle Beam weaponry, but was defeated by the Soviet
Union just before achieving operational status. Thus America lost the
Battle of the Harvest Moon; and though this space battle is still a
secret, its consequences are cropping up all around us.

   In Topics #2 and #3, I will try to bring you up to date on what has
happened militarily and diplomatically as the result of our losing the
Battle of the Harvest Moon. Right now, though, let me tell you the
latest developments in space itself. On Sept. 29, 1977, just two days
after the Battle of the Harvest Moon and the Gromyko ultimatum to
Jimmy Carter, the Soviet Union launched Salyut Space Station No. 6.
This was the same day that an Atlas Centaur Rocketbecame the second
American rocket in two weeks to explode during launch. The orbiting of
Salyut 6, my f riends, signaled the beginning of the first
Soviet-manned mission to the moon; and the next day as the Soviet
moon-era was just dawning, the sun set on America's moon era. The NASA
Space Center in Houston radioed remote control commands to the moon to
shut down all automated equipment still operating there; and, as
usual, the quiet and largely unnoticed news reports about it told us
this was being done to save money.

   On October 9, Soyuz 25 was launched with a two-man crew to
rendezvous with Salyut 6; and just as the crew of Apollo Eleven
carried an American flag with them to plant on the moon, the crew of
Soyuz 25 took a copy of the newly adopted Soviet Constitution with
them. As Mission Commander Kovalyonok climbed aboard the space craft,
he gave not the usual friendly wave but a clenched fist salute for the
benefit of the television audience. Then Soyuz 25 lifted off from the
same pad at the Baikonur Cosmodrome that had been used twenty years
ago to launch Sputnik One. Less than two days later, Radio Moscow
broke a 24-hour silence about the mission, which had caused many
observers to wonder if the cosmonauts might have suffered harm. It was
announced that the cosmonauts were in good condition and that their
Soyuz 25 capsule had landed safely. Supposedly, the mission had been
aborted because of the failure of Soyuz 25 to dock successfully with
Salyut 6; but actually, my friends, Soyuz 25 was successful in its
rendezvous with Salyut 6. The purpose was not to dock and remain in
orbit but rather to link up to a lunar propulsion and equipment
module--and this Soyuz 25 did! By the time Radio Moscow broke its
silence with a cover story about an aborted mission, Soyuz 25 was on
its way to the moon.

   On October 16, after achieving lunar orbit, the crew of Soyuz 25
detached a radio relay package and left it in lunar orbit as they
descended to the lunar surface. And just as two Americans named
Armstrong and Aldrin became the first human beings to set foot on the
near side of the moon, two Russians named Kovalyonok and Ryumin have
become the first to land on the far side of the moon in Jules Verne
Crater. The Soviet Union is now working rapidly to do the same thing
that the controlled United States Government had tried to do--to set
up a Particle Beam weapons base on the moon from which to menace the
earth.

   The operation now under way in Jules Verne Crater is strictly an
interim step. The back side of the moon is being used purely as a safe
haven, and there all preliminary preparations can be made without any
chance, they hope, of observation or retaliation by the United States.
The plan is to assemble everything that is needed for an initial
Particle Beam installation, including equipment, crews of cosmonauts,
life-support equipment, &c in a safe back-side location. Then, rockets
will be used to transport everything to the intended location on the
near side, rapidly and all at once. If all goes according to plan, the
Soviet Particle Beam Base will be able to become operational very
quickly after the fast move to the near side. In this way, the Soviet
Union expects to have its Particle Beam Moon Base in operation and
able to protect itself before any conceivable preemptive strike could
knock it out. They have no wish to suffer the same fate they
themselves inflicted a month ago on the secret American moon base.

   Once it is operational with the charged Particle Beam weapon to
protect itself, the Soviet Moon Base will be relatively secure in a
military sense. This is especially true since a small fleet of Cosmos
Interceptors are now in earth orbit, armed as they are with Particle
Beam weapons. Therefore, once the Soviet Moon Base is in operation on
the near side of the moon, the Soviet Union may well choose to make it
known to the world--neglecting, of course, to explain its true
purpose. If so, it will be a startling echo of the early days of the
Soviet Space Program when spectacular exploits in space were always
announced only after they were successfully under way, never
beforehand.

   According to my latest intelligence on the Soviet moon mission, the
project is progressing very rapidly. As of two days ago, October 27,
the crew of Soyuz 25 have already been joined at Jules Verne Crater by
additional cosmonauts, and the components for a Particle Beam weapon
have also arrived. At this rate, the space lift of crew and equipment
to the near side of the moon might come very soon; and if it does, the
timing would be perfect for Soviet propaganda purposes. The twentieth
anniversary of Sputnik One, which was October 4, was commemorated by
launching Soyuz 25 from the same launch pad as was used for Sputnik
One. Still ahead, on November 7, is the 60th anniversary of the
Bolshevik Revolution. How better to impress the world with the vigor
of the Soviet system than by having the brand new Soviet Constitution
praised over world-wide television by a Cosmonaut broadcasting from
the moon?!

Topic #2--When I recorded Audioletter No. 26 last month on September
30, I alerted you to the fact that Soviet submarines were on their way
in great numbers to surround the United States. A military
confrontation was definitely underway, and I warned you that the
possibility of war itself could not be ignored. Only the previous
week-end the Soviet Union had abruptly expelled all Western fishing
trawlers from the Barents Sea where the big Murmansk Naval Base is
located. On Tuesday, September 27 the secret Space Battle of the
Harvest Moon ended the existence of the American Moon Base in
Copernicus Crater, and by that day both the Barents Sea and also the
Sea of Okhotsk off the Kamchatka Peninsula were swarming with Soviet
submarines. While these military developments were going on behind the
scenes, Soviet Foreign Minister Andrei Gromyko delivered a veiled
ultimatum to the United States during a very harsh speech at the
United Nations; and that evening, at Gromyko's demand, a sudden and
unexpected meeting was held at the White House between Gromyko, Jimmy
Carter, and Secretary of State Cyrus Vance.

   Last month I told you what Gromyko told Carter in very blunt
language, and the very next day the two huge Soviet submarine fleets
left their staging areas to converge on the United States. Since NATO
regards the deployment to sea of the Soviet submarine force as a major
warning signal of impending conflict, the situation was potentially
very grave indeed. So I warned you, based on information from my own
intelligence sources, that by October 7, if not before, the United
States would be surrounded along our East, West. and Gulf coasts by
the Soviet submarine fleet.

   On October 5, early this month, Vice Admiral William Reed,
Commander of our Atlantic Fleet Naval Surface Forces, revealed at the
Southeast Sea Power Symposium in Atlanta, Ga., the fact that Soviet
submarines together with many surface ships were present in great
numbers along our Atlantic and Gulf coasts; and he said they were
close enough to destroy American cities in a nuclear war. He added
that in any long war with the Soviet Union, America would be at a
grave disadvantage because of the size and effectiveness of the Soviet
Navy. The next day, October 6, a naval spokesman in San Diego was
reported by a local radio station to have said that large numbers of
Soviet submarines had been sighted in the Pacific also heading in our
direction. On the morning of October 7, 1977, my own reports indicated
that the Pacific armada was about 700 miles west of San Francisco at
its closest point and was spread out over an area of ocean 1000 miles
long north to south and 200 miles deep. The Atlantic armada was some
1600 miles from New York City at its closest point spread out over a
similar area of ocean. At that point the Pacific armada was slowing
down to enable the Atlantic armada to close in to a similar distance.
In the Gulf of Mexico, meanwhile, the fleet of 29 submarines which
were already on station when I recorded Audioletter No. 26, were
simply staying there waiting. By the evening of October 9, the  Pacific
armada was on station, in battle formation, spread out along our
entire west coast at a distance of 400 miles. The Atlantic armada was
just over 500 miles from New York City at its closest point but still
had the job of spreading out to parallel the east coast line. While
this was being done, the fleet west of our shores began injecting a
radiochemical poison into our air by means of powerful fluorocarbon
dispensers. This technique of radiological warfare is exactly the same
as I described one year ago in Audioletter No. 17 in connection with
the Soviet submarine confrontation that occurred at that time--but
this time the formulation involves both plutonium, which is
radioactive, and zirconium. As I revealed in Audioletter No. 17, this
combination is what causes so-called Legionnaire's Disease--and I'll
have more to say about that in a moment.

   Early that day, October 9, British Foreign Minister David Owen left
London unexpectedly for a hurried two-day trip to Moscow. The stated
cover for the trip was to discuss Rhodesia and trade matters, but Owen
was actually going to Moscow to capitulate. In spite of all the things
Great Britain has been trying to do to stand up to the Kremlin, the
Soviet Particle Beam breakthrough and America's loss in this decisive
race, has made the situation untenable.

   The evening of the following day, Vice-President Mondale was
recalled to Washington out of a Columbus Day parade in San
Francisco--the crisis was deepening. By midday October 12 the peak
threat from the Soviet submarine fleet was in progress. In the west
the fleet had moved to within 250 miles from shore; in the east, the
Soviets had moved to within less than 150 miles of New York City; and
along our Atlantic, Pacific, and Gulf Coast lines, Soviet submarines
were essentially halted in position for attack at any moment. The
western fleet continued injecting radiochemical poisons into our air
including for a while strontium 90. There were fresh reports of
fireballs over Russia that day, and the same day it was announced that
Leonid Brezhnev will soon visit Britain due to the progress made
during Owen's weekend visit. Secretary of Defense Harold Brown, in
Europe for talks with our NATO allies, now headed for Yugoslavia, as
had been announced. According to my own information, a high United
States Government official conveyed America's capitulation to the
Soviet Union on October 14 through intermediary channels. I have not
been able to confirm the identity of this official, but the fact that
Brown was in Yugoslavia on that day may not be coincidence.

   In any event, the Soviet threat of war served its intended purposes
well. It placed the United States in a position in which any attempt
to retaliate against the Soviets for destroying our Moon Base would
have been suicidal. In particular, it insured that there would be no
American attempt to interfere with the Soviet moon mission, which took
place during this period. In this respect, it was the Cuban missile
crisis all over again but with the roles of America and Russia
reversed.

   The Kremlin are well aware that the situation now confronting the
real rulers of America is totally new to them and they really do not
know what to do. For the first time they no longer have an invisible
ace up their sleeve to make Russia toe the line, but the Soviet
display of military power and readiness to use it made the controlled
Carter administration cave in--just as Khrushchev had caved in under
the same pressure 15 years ago.

   The Russians are well known for their ability to win games of
chess, and they were not to be bluffed. As a result, America
surrendered to the Soviet Union on October 14, 1977, on terms I will
reveal in Topic #3. And the Soviet acceptance of that surrender was
indicated on October 15 as the bulk of the Soviet submarine fleets
turned away from America's shores and began heading for home. By
October 16, all but 2 of the submarines along our Gulf Coast were
already heading back into Cuban waters, where they were congregated
along the north coast east of Camaguey by October 18. The eastern and
western armadas were far out to sea by then except for 5 each that
stayed on station near our shores. On October 17, with the Soviet Navy
safely out of its threatening posture, NATO began its own two-week
naval exercises in the Atlantic; but the 12 Soviet submarines which
had stayed behind along our shores continued to spew
plutonium-zirconium poisons into our atmosphere to produce
Legionnaire's Disease without any interference. Legionnaire's Disease,
like so-called Swine Flu, is an artificial disease caused by
radiological warfare. My confidential intelligence sources enabled me
to warn that the Government's Swine Flu program was a hoax to cover up
the effects of radiological warfare in America as early as April 1976
in Audioletter No. 11, just after the program was announced by
President Gerald Ford; and in Audioletter No. 17, one year ago this
month, I was able to tell the full story of the Swine Flu hoax,
Legionnaire's Disease, and additional strange illnesses that were
cropping up at that time.

   At this time last year the Soviet Union had begun a program of
experimental plutonium cloud attacks against America's population,
using a formulation that was intended to produce a Swine Flu-like
illness, but that project was never as effective as desired, and more
recently they began experimenting with a plutonium-zirconium
formulation that produces so-called Legionnaire's Disease. This had
been tested first at the American Legion Convention in July 1976 where
180 people became ill and 28 died. Recent cloud attacks by Soviet
submarines have shown that this is a more effective poison than the
earlier one, as Legionnaire's Disease has shown up increasingly
nationwide. As I explained in Audioletter No. 17, Legionnaire's
Disease is basically a form of radiation sickness caused deliberately
at will by secret radiological warfare by the Soviet Union.

   Recently it has been announced that a peculiar pneumonia bacterium
has been linked with Legionnaire's Disease, but this is only a
complication. The basic cause which weakens the body to permit this
bacterial complication is the Soviet radiochemical poison in our air.
Not everyone falls ill who is exposed to the poison in the low
concentrations currently found in our air. Those who are in good basic
health, who get sufficient rest and proper nutrition, have the best
chance of avoiding its effects. They are also the ones who are most
likely to survive if they do contract Legionnaire's Disease. The
mortality rate is about 15%, the same now as it was in the first big
outbreak in Philadelphia. Antibiotics can affect the bacterial
complication but in no way affect the basic cause, which is
radiological. So far, the Center for Disease Control in Atlanta claims
that Legionnaire's Disease has been reported by 22 states and the
District of Columbia. Some spokesmen are now referring to it as
"atypical pneumonia"; but call it what you will, it is spreading. Many
doctors still are not familiar with it, so here is a list of the
symptoms which accompany Legionnaire's Disease: Typically it begins
with a general malaise and headaches; within a day this is followed by
a rapidly rising fever, which may reach levels of from 102 to 105
degrees, together with chills. A hacking cough, stomach ache, nausea
and diarrhea are common, sometimes including bleeding. Yet, as severe
as it is, it is not contagious--that is, passed from one person to
another. Everyone contracts it from the same source, namely the air we
breathe. Not everyone gets all the symptoms, different people seem to
be affected somewhat differently. In small children, I am informed
that it can show up as an especially severe form of croup, due to the
strong effect of the plutonium-zirconium poison in the air passage of
the throat. It may be that this is the reason for the unusually severe
outbreaks of croup now occurring in some of our northern states, which
State Health officials are at a loss to explain.

   My friends, we in the United States together with people in certain
parts of Canada and Mexico, are the victims of a spread ing atomic
plague. It's produced by undeclared warfare, radiological warfare, on
the part of the Soviet Union to demoralize and weaken our will to
resist the final takeover. Thanks to the surrender to the Kremlin by
the Carter administration this month--it's not the Soviet Union that
will be laying down its arms, but we, OURSELVES!

Topic #3--In a news conference on September 29, 1977, President Carter
told reporters that there was no prospect of any immediate agreement
on a second Strategic Arms Limitation Treaty, or SALT II. Two days
earlier Soviet Foreign Minister Gromyko had denounced the sorry state
of Soviet-American relations in very harsh terms and had demanded that
a new SALT accord be agreed upon "without any delay"; and in a hastily
called meeting that evening Gromyko made it clear that the Kremlin,
having put the secret American Moon Base out of operation that day was
now going to start cracking the whip; but Carter's response was more
one of shock than one of immediate total capitulation, and therefore
the Soviet submarines began moving toward America within hours after
Gromyko left the White House.

   The surrender by the United States on October 14 involved America's
acceptance of Soviet demands for a new SALT II agreement that will
effectively disarm America while leaving Soviet armaments free to
expand and develop still further. The only concession granted by
Brezhnev to Carter is a slight extension of time to allow the Carter
administration to prepare the way for America's acceptance of the
treaty to strip us militarily. The extent of the radical shift in
favor of the Soviet Union concerning disarmament was revealed on
October 19 at the United Nations. There, in a committee away from the
limelight, but visible to key members of the world's diplomatic
community, major statements were made by both the United States and
the Soviet Union. The American statement expressed our willingness to
cooperate and declared that an agreement on a whole range of issues
may be just around the corner. The Soviet statement spoke of closing
the arms race and said Russia is ready to proceed with "drastic
disarmament measures"; and the American delegate, Mr. Fisher, expanded
on the fact that he now found a new sense of vigor and urgency,
stressing that the world is experiencing a fundamental shift in
thinking about disarmament.

   My friends, world-wide fundamental shifts in thinking about
anything do not happen without there being a reason; and that reason,
as I have told you, is the end of the American Moon Base and the
exclusive possession by the Soviet Union of the new Particle Beam
Super Weapon. The following day details began leaking out about the
shape of the proposed SALT II accord, and it will continue to be the
subject of heavy news coverage and debate.

   SALT II contains tremendous concessions by the United States with
none of significance by the Soviet Union even on its face. For
example, Jimmy Carter canceled the B-1 Bomber, much to the Kremlin's
delight, with the silly argument that the Cruise Missile would replace
it. The Cruise Missile, my friends, is more vulnerable to Soviet air
defenses than the B-1 would have been. But now, SALT II will even put
the Cruise Missile out of business by restricting its range
sufficiently to force our old slow B-52s to get so close to Russia in
an attack that they can be shot down by the vast Soviet Air Defense
system. In addition, the United States will agree not to provide
Cruise Missiles or the technology to build them to our NATO allies, to
whom the Cruise Missile could be very valuable. In return for this,
America is to settle for a Soviet pledge about their supersonic
Backfire Bomber, the rough equivalent of our B-1 Bomber. According to
NATO intelligence, the Soviet Union is already flying more than 400
Backfires; in other words, they already have a larger force of brand
new supersonic strategic Backfires than our force of 20-year old
subsonic tired out B-52s. And what's more, the newest version has even
greater range than our B-52, and Soviet plants are churning out more
Backfires every month. But the Carter administration has settled for a
promise from the Soviets not to start producing Backfires any faster
than they are doing already. What's more, the Kremlin has simply given
its word that Backfires will not be deployed in a strategic manner
despite their strategic capability. In return for that, we agree not
to count their Backfires at all as strategic bombers, thereby
exempting them from the limits of weaponry spelled out in SALT II; and
we agree to trust them, not requiring verification of any kind. Can
you imagine?

   But as serious as these matters are, they are overshadowed by the
seriousness of what is left out altogether from the SALT II proposals!
They say not a word about the radiological warfare weapons which are
being used right now on the United States. They say nothing at all
about anti-satellite weapons despite their disastrous implications and
despite the fact that even the Defense Department admits they are now
operational in the Soviet arsenal. SALT II would do nothing to
restrict the use of microwave weapons on humans which, as I revealed
in Audioletter No. 20 for January 1977, is also being done by the
Soviet Union. And Beam weapons, particularly the Particle Beam, which
is the exclusive property of Russia now, are ignored altogether. Thus
for example, our strategic missile forces are rapidly being
neutralized while those of the Soviet Union are preserved. Our
early-warning satellites, which we depend upon to warn us of any
attack by the Soviet Union, are being destroyed by Cosmos Interceptor
satellites; and if we were to launch our missiles, properly deployed
Soviet Particle Beams could be used to destroy the warheads in flight.
The rough equivalents in missiles that the Soviet Union now seems
ready to write into the SALT II accord, therefore means nothing. What
is actually being inaugurated now is the total disarmament of America.
Those who are using their influence to have America accept the SALT II
agreement, claim that by granting the Soviet Union such horrendous
concessions, we will take away any Soviet incentive to go to war. But,
my friends, this is the intellectual way to say 'Better Red than
dead'--but if the 'Alice in Wonderland' world of unreality that is
built into SALT II is accepted, then we as a nation will be both Red
and dead. It has taken 200 years to undo the structure for freedom and
prosperity that was devised by our founding fathers. And more than
once the United States has been all but counted out by those who
wanted to destroy us, only to see America rise again, bounce back, and
go on. The Kremlin has no intention of taking that risk by ultimately
sparing us from war. They intend to destroy the American system once
and for all, and our disarmament beforehand is purely for the purpose
of making their destruction of our land easy and without suffering on
their own part. When ancient Carthage was destroyed, the Romans plowed
salt into the ground to ensure that Carthage would never rise again.
Now the Soviet Union is using the SALT treaties to ensure that
America, once defeated, will never rise again.

   My friends, this is the legacy that America is inheriting, thanks
to the totally disastrous policies which have been forced on America
by the four Rockefeller brothers for decades. I have been accused on
occasion of carrying on a personal vendetta against  them, and
sometimes against the whole family whom I have never accused of being
party to what the four brothers are doing. But it is not personal, I
do not make public what I know about their personal lives; but I do
believe that their policies which affect millions of other lives,
should be made public. David, Nelson, Laurance, and John D.
Rockefeller III have never done anything to me personally but their
policies have brought the land I love, the United States of America,
to the brink of utter ruin. Knowing what I know, I have only two
possible choices--either speak out, or keep quiet; and I cannot keep
quiet. To understand why I say this, you have to go through what I've
gone through--you have to suffer, you have to turn over and toss at
night asking yourself "What's happened to this great country?" It's
always been my hope that the four Rockefeller brothers would see the
light and honestly turn aside from policies which are destroying
America. As a great religious leader once told their grandfather, John
D. Rockefeller, Sr., "Great wealth is a trust and it should be used
for the public good."

   As of now, none of the things that could be done to save America
are being done. It may be too late to save America as we know it, but
it is never too late to do what is right and leave the success or
failure of our efforts in the hands of our Lord.

   Until next month, God willing, this is Dr. Beter. Thank you, and
may God bless and protect each and every one of you.
------------------------------------------------
(This file was found elsewhere on the Internet and uploaded to the
Radio Free Michigan site by the archive maintainer.

 All files are ZIP archives for fast download.

 E-mail [e-mail])